pouet.chapril.org est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Chapril https://www.chapril.org est un projet de l'April https://www.april.org

Administré par :

Statistiques du serveur :

1K
comptes actifs

#federation

19 messages14 participants0 message aujourd’hui

My main gripe about #BlueSky is not what they are, but what they claim to be, but not are. They keep talking about #federation as the way to avoid the "big hubs" like X / Facebook, yet I struggle to find anything about how they actually aim to provide anything that will prevent this.

Reading some of the stuff they write about it, is big words and lotsa investor babble. But despite having at least some tech understanding (working developing net based services), I cannot quite map what they promise to how they will make it.

I have a feeling that they will stumble in the fact that there isn't really much of a business model, at least enough to attract investors, in building federated social media. If bsky spend a ton of effort building something others can just "take and use", the others will have a clear advantage over bsky, not having the investment to build it.

Bsky seem to lack a dependable business model. For now it seems to be "become a payment platform".

Am I missing something?

Did you ever hear about MatrixRooms.info ? It's a demo instance of MRS (Matrix Rooms Search) - a search engine of #matrix #rooms across #federation we're developing for a while.

The website got numerous updates, including a community spotlight for small-yet-promising rooms, search relevancy options, and even (finally!) a 1-click form to add your own #matrix server!

Give it a try, and say hi in the #mrs:etke.cc room!

matrixrooms.infoFind rooms on the Matrix NetworkSearch for rooms on the Matrix Network

I’m fairly new to BookWyrm, but I really like that it’s federated, allowing me to track my books alongside other local options like @openreads.

So tonight, I’m going to add all the books I own to my BookWyrm profile. I discovered that if a book isn’t already on the platform, you can simply click “Import” to add it from other sources, or manually add a book!

Feel free to follow me at @midtsveen@bookwyrm.social!

If you do follow me here on Mastodon, please boost this post so others interested might want to follow too.

I've been wrestling with implementing #multilingual content support in Hackers' Pub, our #ActivityPub-powered platform for software engineers.

While ActivityPub theoretically supports multilingual content through the contentMap property, the reality is that most server implementations (Mastodon, Misskey, etc.) don't properly handle this content as of April 2025. This creates a significant challenge for us.

We want our users to share their knowledge in multiple languages, but we need to ensure compatibility with existing ActivityPub servers. I'm considering several approaches:

  1. Creating separate posts for each language with clear language indicators, linking them through inReplyTo relationships (so translations appear as replies to the original post)
  2. Using the primary language in content while storing translations in contentMap
  3. Adding "View in other languages" links at the bottom of each post
  4. Implementing inline language dividers that degrade gracefully on non-supporting servers, for example:
    <div lang="en">
      <h3>English</h3>
      <p>This is the English content…</p>
    </div>
    <hr>
    <div lang="ko">
      <h3>한국어</h3>
      <p>한국어 내용입니다…</p>
    </div>

I'm leaning toward a hybrid approach—showing content in the user's preferred language when possible while providing easy access to other language versions.

Has anyone tackled this problem effectively? I'd love to hear about your experiences or ideas for making multilingual content work well in the fediverse, especially when dealing with server implementations that don't fully support ActivityPub's multilingual features.

hackers.pubHackers' PubHackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.
A répondu dans un fil de discussion

@laurenshof @Gargron @andypiper

The difference here is that there is no ‘one’ Mastodon. So it would be much harder to control the presence of people on the Fediverse than with Bluesky.

And I think exactly this is the message that can be learned from this article: a true social and federated approach, the way the Fediverse works is superior to the centralized approach that Bluesky uses.

#federation = #freedom