T_X<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>mjg59</span></a></span> so for me, there are valid use-cases both for <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/copyfree" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copyfree</span></a> / MIT / *BSD licenses or <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/copleft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copleft</span></a> / <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/GPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPL</span></a>. And especially a "Nobody is going to try to make money on a proprietary fork of an MIT Coreutils" would be a valid, plausible reason for me to choose a <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/copyfree" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copyfree</span></a> license. Without thinking it would undermine the mission of <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/copyleft" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>copyleft</span></a> / <a href="https://chaos.social/tags/GPL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GPL</span></a>.</p>